Evaluation Each member of the group will be expected to contribute to this special edition of the newpaper, and it will be assessed by both teacher and class-mates. The criteria for evaluating the project will be decided by your teacher, but will probably be very much like this: 1. Group cooperation and individual contribution. 2. Planning, organizing and processing of the material. 3. Completion of all stages of the assignment. 4. Quality of reasoning, and skill in making use of evidence. 5. Quality of observations and deductions. Sophistication of reasoning and argument. 6. Written work shows clear purpose and organization, is well presented and grammatically accurate. 7. Would Holmes have been proud of you, or are you another Watson?
These, or similar ratings will be used with particular reference to the following presentation skills:- Layout to include graphics
from one or more sources. |
| Poor | Insufficient preparation, weak organization, and incorrect information. Lack of effort evident, rather than low ability. Completed at least one of the layout skills. Little evidence of logical argument. |
| Better | Shows little detail and some wrong or unclear information. Beginnings of deductive processes in evidence. Made a fair effort. Completed some of the layout skills. Argument weak and unconvincing. |
| Average | Considerable detail included, mostly correct and fairly well organised. Evidence of some deductive processes. Good effort overall. Layout skills mostly completed, but opportunities for extension not grasped. Clear and fairly well developed argument. |
| Good | Has a well-organized, logical, and focussed presentation with few errors. Evidence of good deductive processes. Clear evidence of much hard work. Completed most of the layout skills. Clear, concise and well articulated argument. |
| Excellent | Shows outstanding work, rich in depth and precise detail, with a consistent, powerful presentation and few or no errors. Evidence of excellent deductive processes, and very considerable effort throughout. Completed all layout skills to a consistently high standard. Argument very tight and difficult to challenge. |
Menu |
Home |